2014 Fantasy Baseball: FSWA Expert Draft – Team Recap (Part One)
Monday night I participated in a FSWA 12-team fantasy baseball snake draft. The league is full of experts and is named after 2013’s FSWA Fantasy Baseball Writer of the Year Jason Collette. If you follow me on Twitter, you know Jason, I, and Eno Sarris were the finalists. Congrats again to Jason as it was well deserved.
During a draft, you must plan ahead and acquire the right pieces to build a winning team. There are times when you go in with a plan, and for one reason or another, that plan changes. This discussion is to look what we have done and what we could or should have done and apply it to others drafts. We aren’t necessarily concentrating on particular players, instead, we are focusing on how we go about making the decisions to select these players.
Here is a quick league overview:
Hitting Categories: Pitching Categories:
OBP QS
SLG ERA
Runs WHIP
RBI Strikeouts
SB Saves
-Additional Roster Spots: CI, MI, Second Catcher.
-Daily Roto league (not head-to-head)
-Maximum of 180 Starts
No home runs is the biggest wrinkle. I have done some unique categories before, but this is my first ever FSWA draft and the first time ever drafting with these settings. Not even a mock. I was in a bit of a time crunch before the draft as well, so I adjusted my rankings as quickly as I could.
Here are the participants by draft order. Click on their names to follow them on Twitter:
1. 1. Pierre Becquey 7. Renee Miller
2. Jason Collette 8. Richard Migliorisi
3. Greg Jewett 9. Mead Loop
4. Mike Wollschlager 10. Michael Florio
5. Nick Raducanu 11. Michael Rathburn
6. Jonathon Stalberg 12. Dennis Farrell
I think that covers all the important details. Let’s get started.
|
|
The Plan:
Draft the best available hitters (tiebreaker goes to infielders), focusing on OBP and SLG.
Initial Round One Targets: Joey Votto
Initial Round Two Targets: Troy Tulowitzki
Results: Paul Goldschmidt and Adrian Beltre
The basic game plan for this entire draft was to avoid players who would hurt my OBP and SLG categories. Votto was part of that strategy, but once he was gone, it looked like I would be deciding between Chris Davis, Carlos Gonzalez, and Robinson Cano. I feel very fortunate to land Paul Goldschmidt with the seventh pick. Although Davis had an out of this world season in 2013, I expect some regression towards his 2012 numbers. He will still be great, but I feared the OBP would slip a bit (.326 OBP in 2012). I was not willing to bank on a repeat of a .370 OBP with over .630 SLG. If Goldschmidt was gone and I was put to a decision, I would have gone with Cano.
In the second round, Tulo was gone, so I selected Beltre. It was a selection I quickly regretted, as I should have taken Wright’s superior OBP and double-digit stolen base potential. Of course, Wright too has his issues, but it would have been nice to obtain 30 or so stolen bases between Goldy and Wright.
You can also make a case Shin-Soo Choo. He was an OBP machine last season, but his SLG isn’t close to that of Wright and Beltre, and his career OBP is actually comparable to Wright’s. Not to mention they are third basemen.
I took a deep breath and acknowledged my mistake wasn’t the end of the world. I locked up my third baseman in a thin field and needed to move on in order to have a successful draft.
Surprise Selections: Yu Darvish, Adam Jones
I like Darvish and this selection should still work out just fine, but I still believe you wait on pitching with these types of hitters on the board (same with Kershaw really). This is also the earliest I have seen Darvish go. Again, this is more preference, as it is hard to say any of these first round selections are not elite at what they do.
As you may already know, I have some issues with Adam Jones as it is, but in this format, he is not a selection I expected until much later. He had a .318 on-base percentage last season (.322 for his career).
|
|
The Plan:
Draft a top middle infielder with speed/SLG combo. Then draft best hitter available (preferably one that contributes to the stolen base category).
Initial Round Three Targets: Jason Kipnis
Initial Round Four Targets: Justin Upton/Yasiel Puig/ Matt Carpenter/Joe Mauer
Results: Justin Upton and Yasiel Puig
At this point in the draft, my eyes are on Joe Mauer. But now wasn’t the time. Buster Posey and Carlos Santana were both still on the board and I thought I could wait another go around before I had to make a move on Mauer. I took the chance and decided to wait.
I was hoping Kipnis would fall to me, but he did not. Neither did Pedroia. This format is a good one for Matt Carpenter, but his lack of stolen bases had me pass initially in round three. He was then taken in round four before I selected, leaving me with the following situation.
In round three, I chose Upton over Puig simply because I believe he has the safer floor in this format. Upton has never posted an OBP lower than .350 and although his SLG has varied, he should hover above .450 with the possibility of eclipsing .500 mark. When I made this selection, I assumed I was choosing between having Puig or Upton on my team. I never expected ManBearPuig to make it back to me, but when he did, I thought ‘why not?’ Carpenter was scooped up and Puig walks enough, so even if he hits .270 this season, his OBP should still be in the .340 range. Despite the reckless driving and the extra weight e put on, the upside was too much to pass up.
I did not obtain any middle infielders, but I did get a couple of SLG hitters with some speed in Puig and Upton.
Surprise Selections: Carlos Gomez, Alex Rios, Starters
I have a hard time trusting Gomez and Rios’s OBP contributions. Starters flew off the board, eight in rounds three and four. I do my best to avoid taking pitchers early, but if the draft continues in this manner, a change in plans will have to happen.
|
|
The Plan:
Continue taking high OBP/SLG hitters (specifically an infielder), but be ready to pounce on a starter if more come off the board.
Initial Round Five Targets: Jason Donaldson/Joe Mauer
Initial Round Six Targets: Gerrit Cole, Matt Holliday
Results: Joe Mauer and Gerrit Cole
The plan was to take both Josh Donaldson and Joe Mauer in rounds five and six. That plan was spoiled. I thought Mauer was a nice value in round three, so I am very happy to get him here. Being patient paid off and I now have a very solid foundation of OBP and SLG combos. Normally, I wait on the catcher position, but there was too much value here to ignore (Mauer getting every day at-bats as a 1B).
In very surprising fashion, pitchers were coming off the board at a quicker rate than I anticipated. A total of 14 starters were taken after 64 picks. I expected something like 10. There is no reason to be stubborn at this point. I felt comfortable with my offensive foundation, so I decided to go with Gerrit Cole. A trendy pick, I know, but he was the highest rated starter on my board. I did consider Holliday here, but I thought he could make it back to me in round seven. He did not.
At this juncture in the draft, I felt I was a little light on speed and realized my infield situation was not going as planned. Those things happened to go hand in hand since I planned to scoop up some of my steals via my middle infield spots.
Surprise Selections: Billy Hamilton, Brandon Phillips
Billy Hamilton at 57 was quite surprising. You have seen this horse beaten before, but I’m not sure there is much profit here in this selection. Hamilton has to be good, very good, in this spot. That seems a lot to ask in an OBP/SLG league.
Brandon Phillips is already falling off offensively, but again, in an OBP league, his value is that much lower.
My Current Roster (Six Rounds):
C- Joe Mauer
C-
1B- Paul Goldschmidt
2B-
SS-
3B- Adrian Beltre
CI-
MI-
OF- Justin Upton
OF- Yaseil Puig
OF-
OF-
OF-
UTIL-
P- Gerrit Cole
|
|
The Plan:
Add speed. And as usual, continue to focus on OBP/SLG production.
Initial Round Seven Targets: Starling Marte/Kyle Seager/Jayson Werth/Wil Myers
Initial Round Eight Targets: Gio Gonzalez/Mat Latos/Brandon Belt
Results: Jayson Werth and Brandon Belt
Several possible targets come off the board and again, I was choosing between two outfielders. This time it was Jayson Werth and Wil Myers. Under these settings, I give the edge to Werth. The teams behind me had OF needs, so I wasn’t sure he would make it back to me in round eight.
Looking back, I should have selected Segura. This is the part of the draft where I was too concerned about OBP and this was short-sighted on my part. Considering part of the plan was to add stolen bases, you would think this was a slam dunk selection. The Beltre choice is really one of preference, but this may be my first true draft misstep. If I select Segura, I obtain a leadoff hitter with a high amount of steals, and some upside. Considering the roster situation, this was the pick to make. And I missed it.
This is where we need to change our plan. If you noticed, I didn’t mention anything about drafting a middle infielder, and yet I did so in prior rounds. Sometimes you need to reset yourself during a draft and remember what you need to achieve. Even clicking through each position to view the players can be helpful in triggering those thoughts. I lost sight of the bigger picture because I got caught up in my OBP/SLG games. Maybe I got too stubborn with my thought process.
In round eight, I ended up going with plan C. Gio Gonzalez was A, Latos was B. Belt was C. Napoli also has a higher value in this format, but he has age and health issues working against him. It appears unlikely that Belt would make it back to me by pick 104.
Overall, these two rounds could have gone better. Werth and Belt should be good, but I probably did not maximize my draft’s potential. In fairness, the Belt selection occurred because Gonzalez and Latos were sniped. However, if I took Segura in round seven, there is a chance Myers or Werth make it back to me in round eight, or perhaps even one of the starters. It created a ripple effect, and I paid for it dearly.
I missed out on adding a starting pitcher among a group of draftees that have not been shy about taking them off the board. I wasn’t thrilled. There were now two concerns. One was my middle infield, and two was my starting pitching. It was not my intention to wait on the middle infield positions, but after passing on Segura and then drafting Belt, it was becoming obvious that waiting even longer may be the best course of action. And the way starters were coming off the board, I thought I also may have to get creative with my staff. Trouble’s ahead?
Surprise Selections: Pedro Alvarez, Mark Trumbo
At this point in the game, you are taking who you believe in more and more. The ADP reports we sometimes rely on are basically out the window for the most part anyway. However, I do wonder if the SLG contributions of Alvarez and Trumbo make up for their horrific OBPs. I think you can certainly make more of a case for Alvarez, who in a daily league, can be benched against lefties.
|
|
The Plan:
Take the best starter on my board (try to get strikeouts). Also, with closers coming quickly off the board, grab a closer in round 10 to as a pre-emptive strike against the closer run (focus on strikeouts).
Initial Round Nine Targets: Alex Cobb, Julio Teheran, Masahiro Tanaka
Initial Round Ten Targets: Glen Perkins
Results: Alex Cobb and Glen Perkins
Well, the first part of the plan worked out well. Welcome aboard Alex Cobb. I was happy to snag him as my second starter.
Unfortunately, the other half of my plan was also my second blunder of the draft. I took Glen Perkins. The caliber of closer really isn’t the issue (knee should be fine) here. It was something totally different. Can I just blame ESPN’s draft software? Maybe next year they can separate relievers and starters for us. Of course, I should be paying attention, so this one is all on me. So what am I rambling about you ask? Well, I thought there were less closers on the board (for instance, I didn’t even see that Uehara and Robertson were still available) and I didn’t want the closer run to happen after my 10th round selection, leaving me with potential problems in the saves category. I completely misjudged the situation. If I correctly evaluated this scenario, I would have selected Hill, Prado, or perhaps Teheran. Head meet wall.
Surprise Selections: Glen Perkins
#@%^!
|
|
The Plan:
Finally address my middle infield issue. Look at starters, but keep an eye on the catcher situation.
Initial Round Eleven Targets: Aaron Hill/Chase Utley
Initial Round Twelve Targets: Danny Salazar/Jason Castro
Results: Danny Salazar and Jason Castro
And there goes Hill at the top of Round eleven, along with Utley. I am not big fan of Murphy in this format, so I passed. I decided to take Danny Salazar, while keeping an eye on the catcher position. Castro was one of the few catchers available who wouldn’t drain my OBP, so I pulled the trigger.
Salazar, again, is a trendy pick, but with health concerns surrounding Hamels and Iwakuma, he became the top SP on my board.
My 12th round selection completes my catching duo. Castro has the best OBP potential of the remaining catchers and his low IFFB% and new approach gives me enough believe that he could replicate 2013.
Bogaerts was nabbed shortly after, and I then wondered if he should have been my pick, but I also know if I can draft Jed Lowrie (SS/2B), the value between the two should be close (if both remain healthy).
Surprise Selections: JJ Hardy, Manny Machado
I understand drafting for position, and I certainly take players based on availability as well (hence the Castro pick), but sometimes the value is just not there. Hardy annually posts low OBPs, and although he hits homers, his slugging percentage the past two seasons weren’t enough to warrant his low on-base skills.
As for Machado, he is still much more about the defense than offense and that knee still has to be a concern. He produces similar on-base and slugging numbers to Hardy, but comes with more upside.
My Current Roster (12 Rounds):
C- Joe Mauer
C- Jason Castro
1B- Paul Goldschmidt
2B-
SS-
3B- Adrian Beltre
CI- Brandon Belt
MI-
OF- Justin Upton
OF- Yaseil Puig
OF- Jayson Werth
OF-
OF-
UTIL-
P- Gerrit Cole
P- Alex Cobb
P- Danny Salazar
P- Glen Perkins
After the 11th and 12th rounds, I knew I would have to not miss on Jed Lowrie (2B/SS). Other middle infielders I kept in mind were Brian Dozier, Omar Infante, and Stephen Drew. I also was aware that my stolen bases would have to come from the rest of my outfield, since these infielders weren’t going to get it done in that aspect. The plan was to grab Brett Gardner and possibly Ben Revere if he fell far enough.
I didn’t exactly know what to foresee going into this draft, and I would say parts of it have not gone as expected. However, I believe in adjusting to the situation and getting proper value. I never would have imagined that my catcher situation would be completed before I drafted a second baseman and shortstop. Mind blown.
As for my team, I believe I am leading the way in the OBP and SLG categories, while having a nice starting pitcher foundation.
Can I complete my plan of drafting above replacement level middle infielders? Can I address my stolen base issues without crushing my OBP and SLG? And what about filling out the rest of my staff and closers? A lot to be done. Can I get it done? Find out tomorrow.
And be sure to leave comments in the section below and hit me up on Twitter. Would love to know how you feel about my team thus far and my approach. I am curious to hear how you feel about the other teams as well. Thanks.
4 Comments
Love this site. Keep up the great work. I’m having trouble in my mocks. I’m in a new 12 team, head-to-head points league with 23-man rosters, 7 bench spots, and 8 keepers. When is too early to draft Matt Harvey to stash on the bench or use as trade bait late in the season. Round 20 too soon? Too late?
Thanks for reading Chris and for the compliment.
As for your question, what I would do is rank the pitchers (and hitters) you feel will make an impact on your current roster. Helium in his ADP makes it unlikely, but if a talent like Salazar is there in round 20, you must take him over Harvey. You get this season from him, and he has the potential to be a keeper. Plus, he’s awesome. Same goes for a player like Teheran. Even a useful veteran can’t be passed up.
You should be looking to win this year. I’d personally start looking at Harvey when impact talent starts disappearing. If I have starting spots to fill, I am taking guys like Brad Miller, or a closer like Jim Henderson over Harvey. I look to win and I believe I can find other keeper types through the draft and during the rest of the year.
If you have a selection of lesser impact players like C.J. Wilson or Justin Morneau to choose from, and your starting lineup is complete, I would then perhaps go with Harvey, especially if the league has DL spots. No DL spots makes it tougher.
I would really go through it, especially as the draft is on-going, and draw a line. Without looking too closely, I would guess about rounds 22-24 is where I’d start to consider stashing Harvey. That may be too late, however.
Hope this helps and thanks for reading.
I really like the use of OBP and QS. I’d rather see HRs replaced with another counting stat say TB so you are rewarded with volume. Good analysis and useful insight.
Thanks.
The no HR category in this league is interesting and I think it forces you to look at the player pool and skills differently. Certainly players jump way up (like Mauer) because you don’t have to worry about making up his 10-12 HR’s.
You could swap out TB with SLG%, but perhaps they make it a ratio stats just in case some owners don’t keep up with their teams (although doubtful in an expert league like this – don’t want to be embarrassed), so the standings don’t become unbalanced.