Smaller Giants. Bigger Reward? A look at Matt Cain and Jonathan Sanchez
LINCECUM
5-1 / 80K / 3.00ERA / 1.12WHIP / .205BAA
CAIN
3-4 /
SANCHEZ
2-4
Two big things are putting Lincey slightly ahead this year – the fact that he is 5-1 and also that he is leading the league in Ks with 80. The truth is that Sanchez and Cain have been jipped wins with practically no run support. Cain's 1 hitter was phenomenal but it was predeceased by 2 losses which he only gave up 2 runs and received 1 run in return. In 3 of Sanchez's losses he's given up 7 hits/4runs in 22 innings and received ZERO runs! Comparatively the Giants have scored in every game Lincecum has pitched in and actually outscored opponents 58-40.
Lincecum will undoubtably lead the league in strikeouts again this year. Barring any injuries I’d be shocked if he doesn’t hit his 250+ mark again. Sanchez though is going to put up very respectable numbers too. He has K’d 11 twice and 10 three times in his short career and should have a very good chance to reach the 200 mark this year. Cain on the other hand has averaged slightly over 200 innings the past 4 years and the closest he has come was 186K. Forget the strikeouts with Cain though – last year his ERA dropped 87 points, his WHIP by 18 points and his BAA by 19 points. So far this year he has lowered all those categories by 49/17/35.
Try to build your team with players like Sanchez or Cain who cost a quarter of the price of Lincecum but at the end of the year will hopefully give you 3/4 of the performance or better. Now I'm not telling you you're stupid to have Lincey on your team – I'm just saying be a bargain hunter.
How do you think Sanchez will pitch today? Who do you think is better Matt Cain or Sanchez?
Leave a comment or reply to us on Twitter.
Twitter.com/fantasyfix_evan or
Twitter.com/thefantasyfix
Tags: Fantasy Baseball Advice, Fantasy Baseball Blog, The Fantasy Fix, MLB, NL, Tim Lincecum, Matt Cain, Jonathan Sanchez, San Francisco Giants